Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As a group of Iraqi students told me, "Isn't it terrible to see that Western elites came here to demonstrate in support of Saddam against the Coalition, and when we took the streets to demonstrate against the Saddam war crimes, they didn't show up?"

It is too early to say, but could this be the first sign that GW Bush will be another Ronald Reagan; "just a dumb US President" who happens to trust the eternal thruths about human freedom, and succeeds where all his detractors have failed so miserably?

1 posted on 12/11/2003 10:36:42 AM PST by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ScaniaBoy
Wonderful post. Thanks.
2 posted on 12/11/2003 10:47:35 AM PST by keats5 (And don't you dare correct my spelling!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FITZ; dennisw; knighthawk; yonif; Sabertooth; Grampa Dave
Go Iraqis! Seize your freedom, and never let it go!
3 posted on 12/11/2003 10:49:38 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ScaniaBoy
Thanks for the post. Of course the left wing mediots of the world will either spike this story or down play it.

"The BBC and CNN downplayed the events, while al-Jazeera mislead the Arab world about them. The jihad network spent more editorial energy undermining the objectives and the credibility of the event than reporting it.

"The anchors, to the disbelief of many viewers in the Arab world, said the marchers were "expressing views against what they call terrorism" (emphasis added). Al-Jazeera evidently reserves to itself the definition of terrorism. Since September 11, the network has systematically added "what they call terrorism" to each sentence reporting terror attacks by al-Qaeda, other jihadist factions and the Saddam. In sum, that is not terrorism, but a Western view of what is legitimate violence. But al-Jazeera's sour surprise with the first steps of popular resistance to jihadism in Baghdad took the network by surprise. As it was airing the segment, its anchors lost linguistic balance and added this time: "The demonstrators are criticizing what they call violence!"

Hence, the editors in Qatar were trapped ideologically. They couldn't even accept the idea that Arabs could be marching against violence, so they described tens of massacres and bombings as "alleged violence," (ma yusamma bil unf). The al-Jazeera debacle was probably the most important victory of the demonstration.
5 posted on 12/11/2003 11:12:20 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Time to visit this website and join up: http://www.georgewbush.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ScaniaBoy
bump
9 posted on 12/11/2003 11:30:57 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ScaniaBoy
Tom Daschle, "I am saddened. Deeply saddened."
10 posted on 12/11/2003 11:37:19 AM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ScaniaBoy
We need factories, we need peace, no fascists, no fanatics

In other words, Iraqis don't want any one-world liberal democrats such as Ted Kennedy.

13 posted on 12/11/2003 11:44:33 AM PST by thinktwice (America is truly blessed ... with George W. Bush as President..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ScaniaBoy
I never thought I would write this, but WAY TO GO, IRAQIS!
15 posted on 12/11/2003 9:40:45 PM PST by DarthMaulrulesok ("I bid you stand, Men of the West" - Lord of the Rings, Return of the King.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson