As a group of Iraqi students told me, "Isn't it terrible to see that Western elites came here to demonstrate in support of Saddam against the Coalition, and when we took the streets to demonstrate against the Saddam war crimes, they didn't show up?"It is too early to say, but could this be the first sign that GW Bush will be another Ronald Reagan; "just a dumb US President" who happens to trust the eternal thruths about human freedom, and succeeds where all his detractors have failed so miserably?
1 posted on
12/11/2003 10:36:42 AM PST by
ScaniaBoy
To: ScaniaBoy
Wonderful post. Thanks.
2 posted on
12/11/2003 10:47:35 AM PST by
keats5
(And don't you dare correct my spelling!)
To: FITZ; dennisw; knighthawk; yonif; Sabertooth; Grampa Dave
Go Iraqis! Seize your freedom, and never let it go!
3 posted on
12/11/2003 10:49:38 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: ScaniaBoy
Thanks for the post. Of course the left wing mediots of the world will either spike this story or down play it.
"The BBC and CNN downplayed the events, while al-Jazeera mislead the Arab world about them. The jihad network spent more editorial energy undermining the objectives and the credibility of the event than reporting it.
"The anchors, to the disbelief of many viewers in the Arab world, said the marchers were "expressing views against what they call terrorism" (emphasis added). Al-Jazeera evidently reserves to itself the definition of terrorism. Since September 11, the network has systematically added "what they call terrorism" to each sentence reporting terror attacks by al-Qaeda, other jihadist factions and the Saddam. In sum, that is not terrorism, but a Western view of what is legitimate violence. But al-Jazeera's sour surprise with the first steps of popular resistance to jihadism in Baghdad took the network by surprise. As it was airing the segment, its anchors lost linguistic balance and added this time: "The demonstrators are criticizing what they call violence!"
Hence, the editors in Qatar were trapped ideologically. They couldn't even accept the idea that Arabs could be marching against violence, so they described tens of massacres and bombings as "alleged violence," (ma yusamma bil unf). The al-Jazeera debacle was probably the most important victory of the demonstration.
5 posted on
12/11/2003 11:12:20 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Time to visit this website and join up: http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: ScaniaBoy
bump
9 posted on
12/11/2003 11:30:57 AM PST by
VOA
To: ScaniaBoy
Tom Daschle, "I am saddened. Deeply saddened."
10 posted on
12/11/2003 11:37:19 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: ScaniaBoy
We need factories, we need peace, no fascists, no fanatics In other words, Iraqis don't want any one-world liberal democrats such as Ted Kennedy.
13 posted on
12/11/2003 11:44:33 AM PST by
thinktwice
(America is truly blessed ... with George W. Bush as President..)
To: ScaniaBoy
I never thought I would write this, but WAY TO GO, IRAQIS!
15 posted on
12/11/2003 9:40:45 PM PST by
DarthMaulrulesok
("I bid you stand, Men of the West" - Lord of the Rings, Return of the King.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson