Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Naspino
What is HUGE? If you mean 50+ million more than the constitution party will get then I agree. We have a two party system. Put your effort in off election years of education people and when their numbers poll above or near the DNC then I'll vote with you. Till then I'm not a Bushbot I'm and anti-Deanbot. I do NOT WANT to live under 4 years of Dean.

More than 50% of the vote went to Gore. So, blame godless liberal America if Dean gets elected. I can't be blamed for electing someone I don't vote for so your argument is afallacious lie, but then again, it is the same mantra that you Bushies repeat over and over - it's all you got even if it is lame.

You know if God is calling you to help subject 280 million people to 4 more years of rampant liberalism then go for it -- but you'd be happier over at the DU during those 4 years.

You mean under Bush? The explosion in big government? Got an excuse for that liberalism? Or his kissing up to Mexico and turning a blind eye to illegal immigration? Huh? Or his kissing up to homosexual churches in his attempt to try to please everyone at the expense of truth? Got any defense for Bush? Let's shine the spotlight on Bush.

Next post, I expect to see some sort of rational defense for Bush's liberal anti-constitutional policies. If you can't defend it, just go away. I don't have time for Bush worshippers.

563 posted on 12/16/2003 10:09:56 AM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]


To: exmarine
More than 50% of the vote went to Gore. So, blame godless liberal America if Dean gets elected.

Got it. You're a whiner. You've already written off America as nothing but sinners and are looking forward to its demise and destruction. Explains a lot about your other posts.

Bush isn't 100% conservative by you're standards and you want to punish him for it like a 4yr old. I wouldn't be surprised to see you complaining about the constitution party if they ever managed to win (never BTW). No one will ever live up to your standards and you'll never actually take part in our political process.

I can debate drug prescription bill and I don't need to defend any increases in spending or the aid to Iraq.

I reject anything else you said as actually being the conservative position. "Kissing up to Mexico" is not a liberal position. I sense some racism in that statement though.

Turning a blind eye to illegal immigration? What do you want a wall -- spot executions? Last I heard military drones were being placed on the borders and Bush was against licenses for illegals. The only way to stop illegals is with a cashless society -- certainly not a conservative position. The constitution party is absolutely isolationist which is the WRONG position for this country. DO you really think God wants America to withdraw itself from this world?

I don't know anything about homosexual churches but I thought it was constutional for a representative of the government to not restrict the free exercise of religion.

I take it you'll be upset when the constitution party doesn't squash all of the "homosexual churches" and probably all other non-Christian churches. I guess you are willing to overlook that part of the Bill of Rights though.

I'm done talking to you -- because you cannot debate without patronizing which is really annoying. Don't know what state you are from but hopefully your vote won't matter.

567 posted on 12/16/2003 10:27:50 AM PST by Naspino (Where did I put that sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson