Skip to comments.
Tom Ridge's Immigration Remarks Draw Fire
newsmax.com ^
| Thursday, Dec. 11, 2003
| NewsMax.com Wires
Posted on 12/11/2003 9:08:56 AM PST by VU4G10
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge's expression of support for giving legal status to immigrants drew congressional criticism Wednesday but heartened advocates. At a town hall meeting in Miami, Ridge said the country needs to "come to grips" with an estimated 8 million to 12 million illegal immigrants and "determine how you can legalize their presence." He also said during a visit to Florida on Tuesday that the immigrants should not be rewarded citizenship.
Asa Hutchinson, undersecretary for border and transportation security, said Wednesday in Miami that Ridge's comments simply reflected the debate in Congress on immigration.
"Secretary Ridge addressed it very honestly yesterday, engaged in that debate, but clearly this administration has not taken a firm policy position on that and the debate continues," Hutchinson said.
But Rep. J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz., said it was "inconceivable to me that Secretary Ridge is speaking for the Bush administration when he unilaterally and offhandedly suggests such a radical policy reversal that is guaranteed to encounter strong opposition in Congress."
The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, slowed talks about whether to legalize millions of illegal immigrants in the country.
Ridge's words excited immigration advocates and one of Hayworth's House colleague, Rep. Jeff Flake, who is sponsoring legislation that would give legal residency to illegal immigrants through work.
"Those who are working here illegally need to be here under a legal framework. Secretary Ridge also understands that this needs to be coupled with serious workplace enforcement," said Flake, R-Ariz.
Judy Golub, senior policy and outreach director for American Immigration Lawyers Association, said she thought it was the first time that a top administration official had made "such a clear articulation of the fact that these folks are not threats and deserve some form of legal status."
Cecilia Munoz, vice president of policy for National Council of La Raza, said Ridge's comments broke two years of silence by the administration on the legalization issue.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; dhs; hr2899; illegalimmigration; immigrationstatus; jeffflake; natinalsecurity; republicanturncoats; tomridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Dane
Rush is ranting and not offering solutions.On this one, I think he's whining. Ranting is more dignified.
21
posted on
12/11/2003 9:56:59 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Kuksool
Tom Ridge came within a whisker of being selected as Vice-President. I don't know which is worse, him being VP or Homeland Security Director. And your solution to the illegals already here and the problem in the future is?
22
posted on
12/11/2003 9:57:26 AM PST
by
Dane
To: All
23
posted on
12/11/2003 9:59:32 AM PST
by
VU4G10
(Have You Forgotten?)
To: VU4G10
I get it: Break our laws and get rewarded. Why didn't I think of that?
To: VU4G10
All the wishing, hoping, whining and kvetching won't change a thing. All those folks are not going to just pick up and go home. We don't have the manpower to round them up and throw them out. We don't have the military capacity to patrol the border. You're all dreaming.
The only practical solution is to document these people and get them on the books somewhere. Maybe then we can get into their pockets and help them start paying their way.
To: DoctorMichael
It's for the Chi-i-ildren
26
posted on
12/11/2003 10:04:08 AM PST
by
VU4G10
(Have You Forgotten?)
To: Reagan Man
...would only allow liberals an opportunity to regain power.
Because what we have now is oh-so-conservative.
27
posted on
12/11/2003 10:04:23 AM PST
by
TheAngryClam
(Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
To: Dane
For starters, Congress should pass Tom Tancredo's proposal to deny federal funding for transportation to states that grant driver's licenses to illegals. Also, local communities that have illegal immigration sanctuary laws and accept the Mexican Matricular Consular card as a valid form of ID should be denied federal funds in Homeland Security. Overall, no federal funds for states that pander to illegals. The military needs to be patrolling at our borders as well.
28
posted on
12/11/2003 10:04:28 AM PST
by
Kuksool
(Real Homeland Security Means Deporting All Illegals)
To: VU4G10
And your solution is?
29
posted on
12/11/2003 10:04:53 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Dane
"What is your solution."
Oh, I have a solution. But it is very un-PC, and the powers-that-be won't like it much.
To: Kuksool
For starters, Congress should pass Tom Tancredo's proposal to deny federal funding for transportation to states that grant driver's licenses to illegals. Also, local communities that have illegal immigration sanctuary laws and accept the Mexican Matricular Consular card as a valid form of ID should be denied federal funds in Homeland Security. Overall, no federal funds for states that pander to illegals. The military needs to be patrolling at our borders as well And for the ones working and relatively law abiding(I know they came here illegally in the first place), do you advocate seizing their assets?
31
posted on
12/11/2003 10:07:08 AM PST
by
Dane
To: big gray tabby
Actually, we do have the manpower, just not the will.
Check into "Operation Wetback," if you have a chance. That was done with far less sophisticated technology than we have available today.
32
posted on
12/11/2003 10:07:22 AM PST
by
TheAngryClam
(Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
To: Dane
"And your solution to the illegals already here and the problem in the future is?"
Round them up, deport them, and close the borders (militarily, if need be).
To: Dane
I do. Seize their assets, and put them on the first bus or boat back to wherever they came from.
Another suggestion: a 95% tax on all money transfers overseas that are sent by people who cannot provide a valid U.S. passport or foreign passport with current visa.
34
posted on
12/11/2003 10:09:29 AM PST
by
TheAngryClam
(Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
To: Dane
And your solution is? Why do you keep defending unpopular decisions by the Bush administration?
35
posted on
12/11/2003 10:09:45 AM PST
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: ought-six
Round them up, deport them, and close the borders (militarily, if need be) Due you have an extra 2,000,000 army troops to do the job? BTW, I am surmising that you would seize their assets also.
36
posted on
12/11/2003 10:09:49 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Dane
The illegals already here should be made to gather all their earnings and assets and leave. Criminal invaders should not be rewarded.
37
posted on
12/11/2003 10:10:20 AM PST
by
Kuksool
(Real Homeland Security Means Deporting All Illegals)
To: ServesURight
Why do you keep defending unpopular decisions by the Bush administration? I am asking for alternative solutions.
38
posted on
12/11/2003 10:10:45 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Dane
Land mines and a border wall are much easier than a picket line of soldiers.
39
posted on
12/11/2003 10:10:54 AM PST
by
TheAngryClam
(Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
To: Dane
And your solution is? I'll vote for Dean!!
Go Dean go!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson