Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
Bring back Kiwi B. It produced more thrust with less fuel than any conventional engine.
4 posted on 12/11/2003 9:14:17 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: <1/1,000,000th%
"Bring back Kiwi B. It produced more thrust with less fuel than any conventional engine."

Yes but.

You are speaking of "specific impulse", i.e., thrust per pound per second of mass ejected. NERVA/KIWI were capable of about 800-900 "seconds" (actually lbf-second/lbm) of specific impulse. Conventional rocket engines (chemical) cannot go much over 500 seconds.

BUT.

Solid-core nuclear engines have a very bad thrust-to-weight ratio. I believe NERVA was something like 8:1 or 10:1, certainly not as much as 20:1.

Thus nuclear engines are not a good fit for a booster; they are much too heavy and the launcher pays a heavy (sorry) price in payload. They are by nature space engines which must be launched on a high thrust and high-thrust-to-weight vehicle. By way of comparison, the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) has a thrust-to-weight of about 60-70. Some of the small engines currently in use for missile defense have thrust-to-weights of hundreds or even a thousand.

--Boris

6 posted on 12/11/2003 9:19:20 AM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson