Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

One more reliable conservative joins the growing criticism of Bush's big government record.

I wonder if he, or his defenders in the magical kingdom of Bushbotland are starting to see a pattern here.

An election in less than a year with a choice between the man who has expanded government more than anyone since LBJ and Dean or Kerry, or Edwards or....

Sad.

As Jimmy Durante would have said, "what a revoltin' development this is."

1 posted on 12/11/2003 4:17:31 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RJCogburn
An election in less than a year with a choice between the man who has expanded government more than anyone since LBJ and Dean or Kerry

Don't forget, he also violated his oath of office by signing CFR.

2 posted on 12/11/2003 4:43:16 AM PST by Sir Gawain (I agree with the Wall Street Journal -- Bush violated his oath of office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
... the federal budget exploded by $296 billion, of which $100 billion (34 percent) was for defense and $32 billion (11 percent) was for 9/11-related costs, including compensation for victims and reconstruction in New York. The remaining $64 billion -- 55 percent -- went for programs and projects unconnected to 9/11.

New math?

6 posted on 12/11/2003 6:04:51 AM PST by optimistically_conservative (Clinton's Penis Endorses Dean: Beware the Dean Mujahideen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
But the fiscal debauchery of the Bush administration is no joke.

"Fiscal debauchery"... good way of putting it. Since we're creating terms he's also guilty of "constitutional negligence".

No it's NOT FUNNY ANYMORE Mr. Bush, you spendthrift, irresponsible, big government, socialist jerk.

8 posted on 12/11/2003 6:22:00 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
As Jimmy Durante would have said, "what a revoltin' development this is."

Nah William Bendix as O'Reilly
9 posted on 12/11/2003 6:26:08 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn


I'm not at all happy about this. The thing is, with a control of the legislature and the White House, they have no more excuses, and yet they spend like drunken harlot who just got her coke money.
10 posted on 12/11/2003 6:28:17 AM PST by Eris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn


11 posted on 12/11/2003 6:51:18 AM PST by bmwcyle (Hillary's election to President will start a civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
Author skirts the very basic problem, that is professional politicians that want to be re elected at any price. Bush or party has nothing to do with it. American people keep sending the power seekers back to Washington. We need more Fred Thompsons.
14 posted on 12/11/2003 9:12:09 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
I'm with ya - Bush is the worst president re. social policies, since Nixon. He is no conservative - this guy has got to go even if it means a democrat - at least we know who we are up against. I hoped for a president who would stand for freedom and the US instead I got a president who stands for racism, open borders, suppression of free speech, spending money like there is no tommorrow, etc. How do we take control of this?
15 posted on 12/11/2003 10:17:01 AM PST by sasafras (sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson