To: EUPHORIC
Actually, I meant it. AS for "Anti-Christian", well, you'd be wrong. I am against Christianity as the sole state-recognized religion here in America, for constitutional reasons. Big difference, once again.
28 posted on
12/10/2003 11:37:30 PM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
( All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Actually, I meant it. AS for "Anti-Christian", well, you'd be wrong. I am against Christianity as the sole state-recognized religion here in America, for constitutional reasons. Big difference, once again.
Actually, you will have to find someone else to swallow your BS. You are so plain and simple to spot it is almost a shame to tell you about it.
33 posted on
12/10/2003 11:43:21 PM PST by
EUPHORIC
(Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
To: Chad Fairbanks
"Actually, I meant it. AS for "Anti-Christian", well, you'd be wrong. I am against Christianity as the sole state-recognized religion here in America, for constitutional reasons. Big difference, once again."
What are you for? Are you in favor of allowing teachers to lead the children in school prayer? How about public displays of the Ten Commandments? What religion is against public display of the Ten Commandments or organized classroom prayers that end with "Amen?"
Is paganism an issue? If paganism is an issue, which of our founding fathers was considering paganism while deciding on our founding documents?
102 posted on
12/11/2003 12:40:38 AM PST by
familyop
(Essayons)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson