To: FairOpinion
Pardon me -- I not only did NOT vote for Mr. Perot, I thought him a megalomaniac, and still do. Mr. GHW Bush brought about his own loss because he did not stand, rockhard, for ANYTHING. He ran on his resume, an ultimate ''insider''. Those were acceptable qualifications (marginally) when running against the state socialist Dukakis in 1988, but after 4 years of his increasingly obvious one-world agenda, were no longer acceptable.
If one constantly votes for the ''lesser of two evils'', one ends up with, ultimately, evil. In 1992, I chose not to do that.
111 posted on
12/10/2003 11:37:50 PM PST by
SAJ
To: SAJ
If one constantly votes for the ''lesser of two evils'', one ends up with, ultimately, evil. In 1992, I chose not to do that When you reach your destination called "perfect political world", would you send me a post card. I have a feeling that I will be waiting a long time by the mail box.
BTW, I guess in your perfect world, that you have the perfect car, perfect house, and eat the perfect diet.
We do not live in a perfect world and never will.
And a Merry Christmas to you also.
120 posted on
12/10/2003 11:47:44 PM PST by
Dane
To: SAJ
SAJ,
GWH Bush stood FIRM for the "cable bill" that did nothing. And he signed the ridiculous Americans with Disabilities Act that allowed idiots like John Edwards to steal enough money to think they can buy the White House!
125 posted on
12/10/2003 11:52:37 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson