Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
Why not demand of incumbents that if they want our vote in 2004, they overturn this law.

Instead of giving them our vote in advance of their presumed conservative actions, they should earn their next vote in advance of the election.

Personally, I would not give credence to the argument that 'we need 4 more years to fix this'.

Show me the conservatism.
103 posted on 12/11/2003 7:50:55 AM PST by Starwind (The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Starwind; Congressman Billybob; Lazamataz
" Why not demand of incumbents that if they want our vote in 2004, they overturn this law."

Congressman BillyBob is trying to get 1,000 people to add their names to a t.v. ad that he will buy (as a candidate), that will violate this law.

I believe we need to put the heat on all congressmen & senators up for re-election next fall who voted against CFR to put their money where their mouth is and do the same.

Next session, on the FIRST DAY in January, one of those congressmen should immediately introduce a bill to repeal CFR. I don't want any "promises to repeal if you vote for me in 2004"... if they're sitting members now, do it NOW.

And I would also like the President to come out firmly in support of such a law, since he broke his campaign promise in not vetoing CFR.

Can someone find/post a list of politicians who voted against CFR? WE can start to pressure them now.

I don't know how to organize this but I am going to get in touch with Senator McConnell today.


We have GOT to get this law repealed.

Like the waves on the ocean erode massive rocks, one grain of sand at a time, if we don't "stop the tide," so to speak, soon we'll have no Constitution left.

Sorry for the semi-mixed metaphor--I'm quite disturbed by this.
115 posted on 12/11/2003 8:20:34 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Starwind
"Why not demand of incumbents that if they want our vote in 2004, they overturn this law.

Instead of giving them our vote in advance of their presumed conservative actions, they should earn their next vote in advance of the election.

Personally, I would not give credence to the argument that 'we need 4 more years to fix this'.

Show me the conservatism."

I just saw this... bump!
116 posted on 12/11/2003 8:22:30 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson