Skip to comments.
The Legacy of Compassionate Conservatism [Rush Limbaugh on the Campaign Reform SCOTUS fiasco]
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121003/content/truth_detector.guest.html ^
| December 10, 2003
| by Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 12/10/2003 8:57:47 PM PST by Lazamataz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-250 next last
To: WackyKat
Howlin was a major defender of this atrocity That is an absolute lie. I never defended this ruling one time.
41
posted on
12/10/2003 9:47:34 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
To: ETERNAL WARMING; Kevin Curry; DustyMoment; At _War_With_Liberals
An exceptional article authored by Messr. Rush Limbaugh.
42
posted on
12/10/2003 9:50:09 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
To: Howlin; WackyKat
I'm sorry, I have to challenge you, WackyKat. I never recall Howlin being behind CFR.
And this article is not about Howlin anyways. Can we please stick to the subject of the article? Thanks.
43
posted on
12/10/2003 9:52:25 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
To: M. Thatcher
MAGGIE!!!!! OMG!!!! HTF ARE YA!!!!
I've missed ya. I wondered how you were on that beach. ;^)
44
posted on
12/10/2003 9:54:00 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
To: Lazamataz
I'm always here. Waiting for you.
To: Lazamataz
any law repugnant to the constitution is null and void!!!!i served my country,and I WILL HONOR MY OATH.very simple procedure.p
46
posted on
12/10/2003 9:59:54 PM PST
by
buccaneer
(no rats on my ship !)
To: Lazamataz
The loser today is the citizen; the taxpayer from whose account the government is funded. We've lost some of our voice - some of our taxation, without representation, has increased. Shades of 1984 have begun to dawn - wake up.
47
posted on
12/10/2003 10:05:20 PM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: Lazamataz
Rush is right on target. This law is an abomination. Bush has harmed our Republic by signing it. We are now governed by socialists, weaklings, fools, and cowards.
48
posted on
12/10/2003 10:07:41 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("...the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.")
To: Lazamataz
Thanks for the notification.
49
posted on
12/10/2003 10:08:29 PM PST
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(This is the 1st US election in which a global party (socialists) are trying to win a US election)
To: Lazamataz
Bump and I heard Rush today (damn, those gals were trying to bust his balls today, huh?) LOL.
He even mentioned a certain other fellow that stands in high esteem alongside Tom Tancredo in my eyes right as his show ended. Tom McClintock. ;-)
Thanks for the post.
50
posted on
12/10/2003 10:13:43 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Want to help Support Our Troops .. For some ideas, check out my profile. Thanks!)
To: Lazamataz
This article is great. Prepare for attack.
51
posted on
12/10/2003 10:20:30 PM PST
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(This is the 1st US election in which a global party (socialists) are trying to win a US election)
To: Lazamataz
"From your sarcasm, it appears you have embraced this ruling, and will obediently line up with Mr. Bush." A few things here.
Congress wrote the bill, Congress voted in favor of the bill, Congress, as far as I understand this system of government, represents the people.
Bush signed the bill into law, instructed his legal team to challenge the sections that he considered to be unconstitutional, and the Court ruled against him.
Things you need to learn:
- 1) We need less Democrats in Congress, because
- 2) we need more conservative Justices on the bench, because
- 3) they would not make decisions we do not generally support, therefore
- 4) we need to reelect Bush to the presidency, and seat a solidly Republican Congress, so that he can nominate conservatives to the bench, and they can approve them.
Why Bush and Republicans?
I'll take any conservative who can get elected to Congress,and/or to the White House in 2004...who do you think can get ELECTED in 2004?
52
posted on
12/10/2003 10:26:34 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Amen, brother!
Oh, by-the-way, the supremes that voted to keep this law:
John Paul Stevens (ultra-liberal)
Sandra Day O'Connor (left-leaning / usually the swing vote)
David Souter (left-leaning "centrist")
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (ultra-liberal)
Stephen Breyer (liberal)
The ones who agreed with me that this is another attack on my 1st Amendment rights:
Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas, Scalia - all strict Consitutionalists.
53
posted on
12/10/2003 10:34:00 PM PST
by
DesertSapper
(--- DNC - idiocy in action! ----)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Rush is right on target. This law is an abomination. Bush has harmed our Republic by signing it. We are now governed by socialists, weaklings, fools, and cowards. I hope that today marks the beginning of a new American revolution, but I doubt that will happen. When leading politicians and the Supreme Court favor restricting peaceful political speech, it is clear that the Republic is dead and that those in power have no other interest beyond protecting their own power. If this country were salvageable, millions of people would descend on Washington, demanding that those responsible for banning political speech be tried for treason. What we are witnessing is comparable to when the Roman Republic became the Roman Empire. I think America will suffer a similar fate. I do hope that 1,000 years from now, people will rediscover history and learn from our mistakes.
54
posted on
12/10/2003 11:14:01 PM PST
by
Wilhelm Tell
(Lurking since 1997!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
So, what do we do the next time the repub's ask for a campaign donation? I just mention that I have not had a job since 1999, and ask when they are going to slash taxes, cut regulations, and get the government out of business's way so they can do their job of making America work...
Usually causes a lot of sputtering at the other end of the line...
55
posted on
12/11/2003 1:54:22 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: Lazamataz
Thanks for the ping.
All is not well in the magical kingdom of Bushbotland.
56
posted on
12/11/2003 3:26:09 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
("Everything happens to me. Now I'm shot by a child."...Tom Chaney after being shot by Mattie Ross)
To: Lazamataz
Thanks for the ping. I guess I'll be listening to Limbaugh more in the coming days. And whatever else may be true about this awful ruling, it seems to me it's giving us a good idea which posters here are on the side of the Constitution.
To: onyx
Good idea. Hate the law, but don't criticize the signer. It ain't bashing if it's so.
58
posted on
12/11/2003 4:43:33 AM PST
by
Doohickey
(The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Well, they're certainly doing a bang-up job getting federal judges appointed. It's not the number of Republicans that is the problem; it's that they're all panty-waist sissy-boys. All the cojones in Congress are in the house.
59
posted on
12/11/2003 4:46:37 AM PST
by
Doohickey
(The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
To: Lazamataz
I definitely want to give Rush some credit: he is part of the media whose speech will not be infringed, and yet he is coming out strongly on the correct side of this.
I appreciate that, it's an indicator that his head and heart are in the right place(s).
60
posted on
12/11/2003 4:51:44 AM PST
by
Yeti
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-250 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson