Uhhh yeah, that would pretty much do it... or are Bush's proposed appointees not conservative enough for you?
You asked me a litany of questions failing to answer my single one to you... how much worse will it be if President Dean appoints the next few Supremes? We might as well just throw America away then and there. Saving our country from a full-blown takeover by socialist leaders is MY long-term goal. We are at a pretty critical point in our history and at risk of becoming a despised subsidiary to the U.N. You are more than welcome, of course, to withhold your assistance in this endeavor because you prefer to bicker about items we have had to compromise on to satisfy the other HALF of our electorate.
I fully accept you may be a political junkie, but I propose your strategy for getting what you claim to want will only prove counter-productive to your own aims.
Not much worse. The Dems have a new requirement of 60 votes for significant nominations. If they go below 40 seats, they'll just lower the threshold and the ratmedia will back them up.
No worse than the jerks the GOP appointed that vote against the Constitution. Or won't stop the Dems from putting people like Ruth Buzzie Ginsburg on the court.
Thomas, Scalia and Renquist...that's about it! You can't rely on Kennedy or O'Conner and the rest are senile.
Yes, in order to save the village Bill of Rights, we must destroy it.
</ sarcasm>
Hb