To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
``The immediate beneficiaries are the Republicans with their huge `hard-money' edge, plus the record-breaking fund raising of the Bush campaign,'' But how does this ruling uphold and defend The Constitution of the United States?
2 posted on
12/10/2003 7:15:18 PM PST by
Momaw Nadon
(The mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work unless it's open.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The group, financed by matching $10 million gifts by billionaires George Soros and Progressive Corp. chairman Peter Lewis, seeks to mobilize voters against Bush.What does "Progressive Corp." sell?
Is it the rent-a-car business?
I want to know so I can avoid giving them any of my business. Thanks.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The soft money ban was nothing compared to the 30/60 day ad ban being upheld. Had the latter not occurred the former alone would not have been nearly as damaging.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The employees of Merrill Lynch gave more to Bush than any other company through September, donating $368,200. UBS was in second place, giving $269,000, the center reported. wow, the people who understand how our economy works best, support the President. I wonder if dean thinks we should still rescind the tax cut.
10 posted on
12/10/2003 7:50:21 PM PST by
Jodi
(Thank you,Mr. President for my tax cut. We went on a family vacation with it.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
``Simply put, the Democrats need soft money more than the Republicans.''
And of course all the union labor and free propaganda from the left wing TV types doesn't count
11 posted on
12/10/2003 7:51:23 PM PST by
uncbob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson