Posted on 12/10/2003 1:42:44 PM PST by The_Republican
OSLO (AFP) - Since the election of US President of George W. Bush in 2000, the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo has become an annual occasion to bash Washington's foreign policy, as comments by this year's winner Shirin Ebadi on Wednesday confirmed.
United Nations (news - web sites) Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites), the winner in 2001, tread lightly, but unmistakeably, in his criticism of US foreign policy, suggesting that it would "not be wise" to attack Iraq (news - web sites).
Bush-bashing became more explicit in 2002, when Jimmy Carter won the prize, a decision which Nobel committee chairman Gunnar Berge said "can and must be interpreted as a criticism of the position of the administration currently sitting in the US towards Iraq".
Wednesday it was the turn of Iranian human rights lawyer Ebadi to take a swipe at the United States.
"In the past two years, some states have violated the universal principles and laws of human rights by using the events of September 11 and the war on international terrorism as a pretext," Ebadi said in her acceptance speech, without, however, mentioning the United States by name.
Nobel-watchers said there may be well be an anti-Bush pattern emerging around the peace prize.
"This is indeed becoming a trend", said Stein Toennesson, head of the Oslo Peace Research Institue (PRIO) said.
He added, however, that the Nobel jury probably did not intend this outcome in their most recent choice.
"The idea was to reward Ebadi for her fight in favour of women and children," he told AFP.
Ebadi may even have played a tactical game, Toennesson suspects, seeking to prove to the extremist forces in Iran that she was not, as they allege, serving Western interests.
Her criticism of the continued detention of prisoners in the US military base in Guantanamo would go in the same direction.
"I think Ebadi's main intention was not to appear as a puppet of the United States," Toennesson said, who noted that Ebadi's comments on rights abuses by the Iranian government were relatively muted.
Espen Barth Eide, researcher at the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NUPI) concurred.
"As a moderate Muslim, she has to show her fellow citizens that she is not close to the Americans," he said.
"People in Iran feel that the United States wants them to change. Ebadi and the moderates also want change in favour of more tolerance and more democracy. It is therefore important for her to mark the difference," he said.
Ebadi's allegations of Western double standards in applying United Nations resolutions in the Middle East would also have been designed to curry favour in Islamist circles, experts said.
Ebadi said in her speech that Iraq's refusal to respect UN resolutions provoked two wars in 12 years, while Israel continues to occupy Palestinian territory with impunity after 35 years, despite several resolutions calling for its withdrawal.
But just because criticism of Bush has become something of a tradition, the Nobel Peace Prize is not actually anti-American, said Barth Eide, citing the prize award to Carter, who is, after all, a former US president.
"The Bush administration's policies are almost systematically out of sync with international law," which is of prime importance to the Nobel jury, he said.
That's what we mean when we say 'liberal media', folks. Class dismissed.
Saddam Hussein maybe? Fidel Castro perhaps?
President Bush should be proud that he is a man For Whom (no) Nobels Toll.
Being from Texas, Bush knows exactly what bullsh*t is and avoids stepping in it. Flies, on the other hand, think it makes a great lunch.
She says that we simply use 9/11 as an "excuse" to commit human rights violations, and she is considered a "moderate"???!!! Yeah, sure, we just love human rights violations over here and rejoiced in the 9/11 bombings since it gave us an excuse to engage in them. And after all, Saddam Hussein is a just a victim and not a human rights infringer. This woman is a joke.
That sentence speaks volumes and volumes about the goofy cult.
Cool. You invented a new oxymoron.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.