Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My2Cents
I stated my case on the other thread. But, in summary, any law which stifles and suppresses political speech, regardless of when it is said, is unconstitutional. Period. I don't care what the SCOTUS have ruled. This law is wrong. And this ruling is wrong. Whoever gains politically is inconsequential. This law put politics over principle. And we, as individuals- or individuals part of a larger, common group, have lost.
173 posted on 12/10/2003 4:50:15 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: rintense
It was Mitch McConnell who convinced Bush they could get the SCOTUS to kill the limited speech portion of this bill, BAD GAMBLE, Now it has to be corrected through Congress
178 posted on 12/10/2003 4:53:46 PM PST by MJY1288 (The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
any law which stifles and suppresses political speech, regardless of when it is said, is unconstitutional. Period.

AMEN! I think they passed this law to silence Third Party Candidates. They are the ones hurt by this. The fact that they have allowed the Leftest media to be the only political voice prior to the elections says it all.

It's time they payed the price. NO MORE CAREER POLITICIANS! No more electing those who will NOT uphold the Constitution! No more electing those who will NOT uphold our laws period! Enough is enough!

I will be writing in Alan Keyes. Is he perfect? No..but he's got more going for him they the two headed hydra system ever will imho.
317 posted on 12/10/2003 7:13:01 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson