Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: big ern
So if I want to run a tv ad 2 weeks before an election am I barred from doing it if I mention a candidate's name or not?

You can run whatever ad you want. You just can't give unlimited amounts of money to a political party so THEY can run the ad.

3 posted on 12/10/2003 7:41:05 AM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Smogger
So George Soros and Moveon still get to run their hit ads?
6 posted on 12/10/2003 7:48:12 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
You can run whatever ad you want.

For all those people who have a couple of hundred grand laying around and want to make a political statement. Lord forbid if I want to pool my money with other like minded people who may be on lower rungs of the economic ladder...

7 posted on 12/10/2003 7:48:35 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
"You can run whatever ad you want. You just can't give unlimited amounts of money to a political party so THEY can run the ad."

Not so---lobbying/advocacy organizations like the NRA are prevented from running ads in the weeks (I forget exactly how many) just before an election. The restrictions are NOT just on political parties.

10 posted on 12/10/2003 7:50:27 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
So if I want to run a tv ad 2 weeks before an election am I barred from doing it if I mention a candidate's name or not?

You can run whatever ad you want. You just can't give unlimited amounts of money to a political party so THEY can run the ad.

There is another provision in the CFR banning independent parties from running ads in the last two or three weeks prior to the election. This decision doesn't seem to be addressing that. I assume there will be another decision on that.

15 posted on 12/10/2003 8:21:57 AM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
That is *not* the only provision in the law - they limited 3rd party spending on campaigns.

Are you saying the USSC upheld even that fould anti 1st amendment piece of cr*p?
22 posted on 12/10/2003 9:26:43 AM PST by WOSG (The only thing that will defeat us is defeatism itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
So ABCDisney-Miramax can release Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911 bit of Bush bashing agit prop 2 weeks out from the election and the GOP will be prohibited from getting soft money contributions to fight this smear campaign with tv ads?

The media's October Surprises just got that much more valuable.

32 posted on 12/10/2003 10:51:31 AM PST by weegee (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson