No I'm not clueless in the least. My point is that SEVEN of the sitting justices were nominated and appointed by Republicans and the Court is still liberal. And your argument is to keep electing them because the new ones will be conservative? Moreso than Reagan nominations?
Some of them want to or are close to retirment: it's important to make sure we get the 60 votes needed to make sure we DO get nominees that we agree with on the court.
I thought 'winning back the Senate' was all we needed last time. Now we need a 'super majority'? Oh joy, who do we get to vote for next time that the RNC tells us is an acceptable 'conservative'?
Did you forget we didn't get the 60 we needed, or are you deliberately ignorning that?
Why don't you stop your pontificating and give us YOUR solution -- who is YOUR candidate -- and how EXACTLY will you be getting the power to undo this?
It's about time you stopped taking potshots and trashing everybody and anything and put some CONCRETE PLANS on the table, bill.
Let's have it.