Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ought-six
I know. That's what I was pointing out. 4 by Reagan, 2 by Bush I, and one by Ford. So the argument that 'we need to get more of 'our' guys in SCOTUS' doesn't fly
860 posted on 12/10/2003 10:33:21 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
So the argument that 'we need to get more of 'our' guys in SCOTUS' doesn't fly

Are you totally clueless about what is going on on the SC?

Some of them want to or are close to retirment: it's important to make sure we get the 60 votes needed to make sure we DO get nominees that we agree with on the court.

878 posted on 12/10/2003 10:37:54 AM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies ]

To: billbears
Unless, of course, you'd rather Dean or Hillary have the chance to nominate them.
882 posted on 12/10/2003 10:38:32 AM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies ]

To: billbears
"I know. That's what I was pointing out. 4 by Reagan, 2 by Bush I, and one by Ford. So the argument that 'we need to get more of 'our' guys in SCOTUS' doesn't fly."

I know. That always amused me. Hell, the SC couldn't be more liberal if Bubba had appointed all nine of them!
903 posted on 12/10/2003 10:43:55 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson