Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA
This decision in no way takes "big money" out of the process. The money just can't go to parties now. It can go to issue advocacy groups, like the NRA and MoveOn - as we have already seen with Soros. How they can spend it may be restricted, but they can raise as much as they want.

I still can believe the issue ad part was upheld. Seriously. I'm in complete and total disbelief. And you can expect the Court will be slammed for it. Remember, the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, NRA, AARP...were all in the same side on this one.
75 posted on 12/10/2003 7:28:09 AM PST by July 4th (George W. Bush, Avenger of the Bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: July 4th
And you can expect the Court will be slammed for it. Remember, the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, NRA, AARP...were all in the same side on this one.

Yeah, that will accomplish a lot [/sarcasm]. The robed thugs just made the 1st amendment conditional upon what the date is....and there isn't a damned thing that will be done about it!

104 posted on 12/10/2003 7:33:36 AM PST by Orangedog (difference between a hamster & a gerbil?..there's more dark-meat on a hamster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: July 4th
July 4th wrote:
This decision in no way takes "big money" out of the process. The money just can't go to parties now. It can go to issue advocacy groups, like the NRA and MoveOn - as we have already seen with Soros. How they can spend it may be restricted, but they can raise as much as they want.
Actually, you are only partially right.

Now, with the 60 day limitations on "electioneering communications," nobody can spend money on "electioneering communicaitons" within 60 days of a federal election or within 30 days of a federal primary.

So, within the next few weeks, Ashcroft will have to start rounding up the liberal groups who produce television ads for or against issues and/or candidates in the Dem primaries within 30 days of those primaries. That's going to work really well for this administration. If they enforce the law, the Dems will scream that they are meddling in the Dem primary process. If they don't enforce the law, the "victims" of the attack adds by issue advocacy groups will say that the Bush administration is derelict in their duty to enforce the campaign finance laws, and we need D's in the whitehouse so that these important laws can be enforced.

This was a big trap for the Bush administration, and the president should have seen it coming and vetoed the CFR law to begin with.

484 posted on 12/10/2003 8:51:18 AM PST by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson