To: rintense
You know, I tried to rationalize why Bush signed this law, solely based on the idea that the SCOTUS would shoot it down. I posted over and over again that it didn't matter that the President signed it- it would be ruled unconstitutional. I backed the wrong horse- and put faith in the wrong people. I should have put faith in my President to uphold the Constitution. Like I said, I backed the wrong horse.
Well, we all make mistakes. If there is a strategy here that the Bush Admin is trying to create, someone please explain it to me.
One of the most baffling aspects of this President is his aversion to the veto. It's a legitimate excercise of Presidtential power. Why fight with one hand tied behind his back?
|
384 posted on
12/10/2003 8:31:12 AM PST by
Sabertooth
(Credit where it's due: saveourlicense.com prevented SB60, and the Illegal Alien CDLs... for now.)
To: Sabertooth
I'm in that camp to ...the President's "aversion to veto".....I really am surprised...and waiting....and waiting....and waiting!
416 posted on
12/10/2003 8:36:46 AM PST by
goodnesswins
(If Hillary RUNS for Prez........ahhhh....................I can't say it.....)
To: Sabertooth
One of the most baffling aspects of this President is his aversion to the veto. I suppose he is trying to show "compassion" for his enemies... :-/
478 posted on
12/10/2003 8:50:19 AM PST by
Smile-n-Win
(Let the Right do what's right, and the Left will be left behind.)
To: Sabertooth
Because we "control" Congress. He doesn;t think it looks good for a GOP president to veto stuff from a GOP Congress.
482 posted on
12/10/2003 8:51:07 AM PST by
GraniteStateConservative
("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson