Replies

Meanwhile our side wants ALL or NOTHING. They don't , and never will, understand that things have to be done slowly or the Sheeple will not allow it to be done at all.

Really, this is such a tired argument.
If you believe in freedom of political speech, then you'd want previous campaign finance laws overturned, save for a few full disclosure provisions. The complaint here is not that we didn't get all of what we want, it's not even that we got none of it. The complaint is that the enemies of free speech won an incremental victory, and our side enabled them to do that.
The mantras when this CFR bill was passed and signed were that this was one of the matters where we'd "take the Democrats issues away!(™)." and "the SCOTUS will throw it out."
The problem is that this issue never had traction with the electorate, so we had no reason to want to take it away, and now the SCOTUS has upheld significant portions of the CFR's restrictions on free political speech

The Liberals have always understood the idea of incremental politics .. just move things slowly the way you want them .. take your defeats here and there as long as the overall movement continues.

This is not an incremental victory for conservatism, it's a shot in the foot, and an affront to the First Amendment.
The problem with too many Republicans is that they define incrementalism by the same yardstick the Democrats do: incremental victories for the Left.

The problem with too many Republicans is that they define incrementalism by the same yardstick the Democrats do: incremental victories for the Left.

Quote of the day. Well said.

The problem with too many Republicans is that they define incrementalism by the same yardstick the Democrats do: incremental victories for the Left.

Just damn.