[justshutupandtakeit]

That article is a great example of NOISE in the tent. It just repeats false statements many of which we have seen here. BUT at least it seems to understand that the "press" is TOTALLY unaffected by this law.

Where do people get the idea that the electronic media is outside government regulation? After all the broadcast rights are GRANTED by government. No one just decides they are going to start a tv station then begins broadcasting what they want when they want.

Why would you try and make people believe that the camel's nose is in the tent when the whole camel has been sitting peacefully in the tent smoking a hookah for decades.

[Eastbound]

"It just repeats false statements . . . "

(a) Okay, I'll listen. Please enumerate the statements that you consider false and add your comments after each one. Thanks.

(b) And regardless, do you or do you not agree that A1 is being kicked in the cajones by the court?

(c) Why was Pres. Bush hesitant to sign the bill? Did he really know it was over-reaching and thought the court would toss it out anyway or was he just dancing around the jimmyjohn before taking a swig?

(d) Why did congress sign the bill if they knew it was over-reaching? Were they just dancing around the jimmyjohn before taking a swig?

(e) Do you have a vested in CFR or do you just like to debate?

(f) If you would state your credentials, I would be in a better position to judge whether I should believe you or the dissenting judges, Congressman Billybob and most of the the FReepers on this issue.

Thanks again and Season's Greetz! -- Dave