WIJG: What are you suggesting - that no law can be unconstitutional unless the high court rules it to be so?
j : Of course it cannot.
So, if the Democrats capture both houses of Congress, pass a law (by a veto-proof margin ;>) declaring Hillary Queen for Life, and the high court refuses to consider the case, you would insist that the law (and the Clinton monarchy it established ;>) was constitutional?
Or would you insist that the transition from constitutional republic to monarchy was just not unconstitutional?
(aristeides - I think our friend has just earned a new nickname. How about Queen Hillarys Court Jester? ;>)