Well, that's just fine.
If you want to go ahead and act like the town clown, go ahead. It is you that is spreeading disinformation, not me. I have addressed this matter numerous times and I know what I'm doing. I know that it was never the founding father intent for goverment to put restirctions on people's activities.
You seem to think otherwise and your assertions on the constitution's aspect are wrong and you know full well it's wrong.
It's very diffcult to take you seriously with your false misconceptions and half-truths about the first amendment and it's concept.You're expecting us to believe that politcal speech wasn't what it was intended for. That's a bald-faced lie and you know it.
Everything I've said is accurate and true. you just can't for whaever reason seem to bring yourself to accept it as fact. What you're saying is not flying with me or anybody else here at Free Republic.
I think I've addressed this enough as it is. You can't handle it, that's just too bad.
Regards.
Apparently the posts regarding the Alien and Sedition Acts went unnoticed by you. They were voted on by many of the Founders. And they would have been ruled unconstitutional I BELIEVE though am not sure. They would be today I am sure.
And the Founders lived within states which placed far MORE restrictions on people including martial status, religious affiliation, imprisonment for debt, discrimination based upon sex, color, race etc.
What I know full well is not what you think I know so don't try and tell me what I know. I am not playing games or being the devil's advocate not having time for such luxuries. Nor do I care if you take me seriously or not though your claim not to rings hollow since you just would not respond if you didn't.
I have repeatedly stated that the first amendment is NOT absolute and there are many examples of speech being curtailed (more so in the past than today.)
Your statements have all been hyperbolic projections of what might happen but they are based upon false assumptions and misinformation about what this law entails not its actual meaning.