Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
To be specific, Marshall made it up and tried to force it on Madison and Jefferson...

And both Madison and Jefferson opposed the ridiculous notion, noting the danger inherent in the suggestion that the federal government be allowed to determine the extent of its own powers. John Taylor of Caroline observed that the power to interpret the Constitution could never be separated from the power to amend it, or the power to amend would be completely destroyed (because any amendment could simply be 'interpreted' out of existence). The Constitution is quite clear regarding the power to amend – but it nowhere says the federal courts shall have the final say in constitutional interpretation...

;>)

1,491 posted on 12/10/2003 4:09:14 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1484 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?
but it nowhere says the federal courts shall have the final say in constitutional interpretation...

Boy we've discussed this one at length, eh WIJG? So...spell it out. What would the next steps be? For a state government of prominence to draft resolutions expressing great outrage?

1,500 posted on 12/10/2003 4:17:55 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson