[Who is John Galt?]

No, because [the Sedition Act] was held constitutional by the process it that it self requires.

Really? And which "process" was that? Be specific.

...the CFR law is now officially constitutional.

LOL! So, if Congress passed a law requiring that all left-handed Americans be summarily executed, with their total wealth transfered to the President and the Supreme Court Justices, and the President and high court "agreed" with Congress on the matter, you would tell us the law was "constitutional?" How nice. How very, very nice.

In reality, you have just dispensed with the written Constitution, and substituted for it a judicial oligarchy. Congratulations...

Offensive to me personally.

Gosh, I'm sure glad to learn that anything you find "offensive" is now officially "bad constitutional law." By all means, please keep us informed - we wouldn't want to mistake "bad constitutional law" for 'good constitutional law'...

;>)

[VRWC_minion]

LOL! So, if Congress passed a law requiring that all left-handed Americans be summarily executed, with their total wealth transfered to the President and the Supreme Court Justices, and the President and high court "agreed" with Congress on the matter, you would tell us the law was "constitutional?" How nice. How very, very nice

Yes, of course. It would be constitutional. However, it would also be my right to revolt but its still constitutional.

I think you don't understand the meaning of the word.