Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato
But they can't do so in such a way that it abriges the freedom of speach, or of the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble

The airways have been treated differently since their inception. We already regulate what can be said and who can say what on the airwaves. That speech has already been violated. Extending the govt reach to advertising before an election is no biggie.

If we were going to get all upset about the ad bans we should have spoken up when the feds banned foul language, nudity, violence as well as tobacco and alcholol advertising.

All this ruling does is say that political advertising doesn't have more rights to free speech onthe air waves than a tobacco advertiser.

1,305 posted on 12/10/2003 12:55:53 PM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1267 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
All this ruling does is say that political advertising doesn't have more rights to free speech on the air waves than a tobacco advertiser.

Oh oh. You're suppose to be in a state of panic. Like the Salem witch trials. Not panicing means you're really a witch.

1,311 posted on 12/10/2003 1:00:16 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson