[El Gato]

If we vote them out in a fit of single-issue petulance, then we will deserve a RAT majority we get. A RAT majority that will match the current hard-socialist-left makeup of that party, not the '90s centrist Bill Clinton version

ROTFLMAO! Bill and Shrillery, Centrists. Right.

Maybe if the heat is turned up, the frog will jump out of the pot after all.

[Dane]

Maybe if the heat is turned up, the frog will jump out of the pot after all

What is with your alls fascination with frogs. Sheesh sometime I believe that I have been transported to a PETA forum.

[Timesink]

ROTFLMAO! Bill and Shrillery, Centrists. Right.

Hillary's no centrist, but Bill was, comparatively, to the 2003-2004 Democratic Party, which is almost off in Green Party land. He had to be, because all he cared about was popularity, and the 1994 elections showed that HillaryCare was not the way to win over the American public. No 2004-era RAT would ever be willing to even consider welfare reform of any sort, for example.

Perhaps a better way to put it is that Bill Clinton doesn't subscribe to ANY ideology. If the polls said idea X would jack up his poll numbers, he'd find a way to fit it into the Democratic platform.