Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WackyKat
And you don't believe the CFR involves the "manner" of holding elections?
1,097 posted on 12/10/2003 11:34:42 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
And you don't believe the CFR involves the "manner" of holding elections?

A campaign is not an election. The "manner" of holding an election is the election itself, not the campaign. It refers to things like ballot access, registration, and party affiliation.
1,105 posted on 12/10/2003 11:36:36 AM PST by July 4th (George W. Bush, Avenger of the Bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1097 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit
And you don't believe the CFR involves the "manner" of holding elections?

Absolutely not! It is stretching this way to far to even conceive that it does. The portion of the Constitution involving the "manner" of holding elections is talking about the time of the year, balloting, who is eligible, etc. It certainly doesn't give Congress free reign to make any old law if they can pretend it is about the "manner" of holding elections. It certainly doesn't allow them to limit the speech about the candidates being elected, or their voting records, or their stated views. Only a moron would believe such - a moron that also believes that the general welfare clause was a generic grant of power, etc.

1,365 posted on 12/10/2003 1:25:09 PM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1097 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson