[Howlin]

You held consistently from the start that his signing it was a good idea, because the House and Senate would override the veto and waste a lot of time (don't know where you got that idea, neither had the 2/3 vote necessary).

We've been over this on this very thread; I never said it was a GOOD IDEA; I discussed the reason why he did it. I can only guess at why you continue to put interpretations on my words that aren't there.

And I never said that the House and Senate would override the veto and waste a lot of time BECAUSE I DIDN"T KNOW THAT. Ask anybody on here; I'm the worst person with numbers on this forum.

I said that the SC would rule parts of it unconstititutional. I was wrong. So were a lot of other people.

Except you, of course.

[NittanyLion]

And I never said that the House and Senate would override the veto and waste a lot of time BECAUSE I DIDN"T KNOW THAT.

"We all know that if Bush vetoes this bill, the House will override his veto; and we're right back where we are today, with nothing but wasted time to show for it."

98 posted on 03/25/2002 3:18:01 PM EST by Howlin