[tet68]

. I certainly do not believe that the Christmas tree was erected with the intention of sending that message, and I understand that some non-Christians did not take that message from the display of the tree. But the Christmas tree conveyed that message to me

I's say she was conflicted, her statement indicates that reason told her that there was no intention to feel disinfranchised/etc but her liberal feelings could not allow any instance that might offend ANY ONE.

She even admits that some non-christians didn't take that message from the display but somewhere, some how, someone might so she had to act.

Pathetic.

the Christmas tree conveyed that message to me
People have been confined for less, what else has been talkin to her???

[little jeremiah]

I's say she was conflicted, her statement indicates that reason told her that there was no intention to feel disinfranchised/etc but her liberal feelings could not allow any instance that might offend ANY ONE.

But she doesn't mind (maybe is even happy about it) that CHRISTIANS are offended. Or even people of other religions who happen to be glad that someone is worshipping God even in a different way!

This stupid letter doesn't even say if the law atrium could have had displays honoring other religious holidays if people had wanted them there. She says there were no other displays - was that because they weren't allowed or no one bothered?