Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.
Had SCOTUS not ruled the way they did, then the Democrats would have succesfully stolen the election from Bush.

Do you mean that, when the Congress assembled in joint session on January 6, 2001 to count the electoral votes that the Republican majority would have counted the illegally and extraconstitutionally appointed Gore electors from Florida, instead of the alternative slate of Bush electors which surely would have been appointed (legally and constitutionally) by the Florida Legislature?

Why on earth do you think they would have done that?

And why is the expansion of Supreme Court power into something which is supposed to be handled by the People in Congress assembled a good thing?

There is zero-ZERO-chance that Gore would have been President if the post-electoral process had followed the Eleventh Amendment as clarified by the Electoral Vote Counting Act of 1877.

58 posted on 12/09/2003 6:53:17 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
Its called E-Q-U-A-L rights. In other words if Florida was to recount the whole state, like the democrats wanted near the end, then all states would have to be re-counted. Thats what really settled the issue and that is the real reason why it went to the US Supreme Court. It became a constitutional issue.
Aside all that. The FL supreme court defied the Florida law which said; That a hand recount was to be done only in the case of an act of god (weather) or fraud. Was there either? NOPE although it was reported the demoncrats did commit fraud in several districts, but the RNC did not care to press charges. They did commit fruad by trying to disallow the military vote.
If you remember..the Chief Justice of the FL supreme court was absolutely livid with that courts last ruling. He and one other judge KNEW they were gonna catch hell for it and they did.
75 posted on 12/09/2003 7:17:13 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
Do you mean that, when the Congress assembled in joint session on January 6, 2001 to count the electoral votes that the Republican majority would have counted the illegally and extraconstitutionally appointed Gore electorsf rom Florida

The Republicans lack the intestinal fortitude to stand up and fight for what is right in the face of overwhelming anti-Republican publicity. Had Gore counted the votes, and had Gore then declared himself the winner, a media tide would have followed. This tide would then have painted the Republicans as blocking the "will of the people."

With the "will of the people" behind them, the democrats would then launch a media campaign not to be believed.

How many middle of the road R's would have folded? Enough.

Was Trent Lott the guy that would then hold them together in the face of overwhelming onslaught that would have ensued?

The question is laughable, as we all know the answer. The Republicans would have folded like a cheap suit.

Yes, President Gore would have been the outcome.

The Republicans showed what they are really made of by their failure to uphold the impeachment and removal of Clinton. The decision in the election would be similar as to the impeachment: Not based on facts or law or on the Consitution, but on political expediancy.

Pretty sad, actually.

100 posted on 12/09/2003 10:46:25 PM PST by Michael.SF. ('By any means necessary' - Black Panthers,Chomsky, Clintonista's, the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson