[Neets]

I try to read things that are foreign to me, things I disagree with, for the simple reason that the more I know, the more easily I can defend my own position.

So other than opining that the argument for anarchism is circular, noting William's succinct comment, and describing the article "interesting" you don't really state a position, one way or the other.

For what reason did you post this LewRockwell Filler?

[William McKinley]

I forced myself through it all. I am glad I did, and am now actually glad it was posted.

Even in our early days, when senators to the US Congress were not popularly elected, but were appointed by state legislatures (therefore, ostensibly, appointed by the best and brightest), our form of government was just a dressed-up version of mob rule.

Too often, those who are the faithful audience of The Anarchist Eye For The Conservative Guy try to argue that they represent the real conservatives (was just debating one today, as it happens). It is good, for once, to see a piece that instead admits the hostility to the very foundations of our nation and its traditions that is inherent in such views.