Actually, no it doesn't. Why else advocate for everyone carrying their own firearms and not trusting anyone with power over you in the form of a government? Because on the whole, people will tend towards the role of "might makes Right". Self government pre-supposes indoctrination in individualistic objective Rights that you would no more infringe on than another would presume to infringe on yours.
Not a bad system. Very elegant. And utterly impractical in todays societal climate. People really ARE too friggin' stupid and childish to act morally without at least a minimum of government. People like this author, and even me in my weaker moments, feel that those incapable of acting morally would soon be weeded out in an anarcho-capitalistic system. I just think that there will always be more weeds than gardeners to pull them.
Voluntary association is dying. Political Correctness forced on us by government is killing it. So how is it "society" he hates?
Answered by:
People like this author, and even me in my weaker moments, feel that those incapable of acting morally would soon be weeded out in an anarcho-capitalistic system.
Except you believe that it would be those who are "incapable of acting morally". That's because you believe that most people are basically moral. The fact is that most people are immoral. Thus, instead of weeding out those "incapable of acting morally", it would weed out those incapable of defending themselves from immoral people.