[Skywalk]

" San Francisco attorney Robert R. Bryan is not surprised to find cases ridiculed with misconduct "

Ridiculed? LOL Does he mean riddled?


And let's employ Occam's Razor here--Isn't it too big a coincidence to expect that a police officer just happened to pull over Abu-Jamal's BROTHER during this incident? Why would some unknown assailant shoot Faulkner? Doesn't it make a lot more sense that Mr. "Revolutionary" Abu-Jamal would be upset that his brother was pulled over?

That and all evidence points to him. They really can't expect people to believe that just because the initial autopsy report said a different caliber was used, that it cancels out all ballistics and further investigation that was done that proved the bullet matched Abu-Jamal's gun, can they??!!?

[Taliesan]

They really can't expect people to believe that just because the initial autopsy report said a different caliber was used, that it cancels out all ballistics and further investigation that was done that proved the bullet matched Abu-Jamal's gun, can they??!!?

Seems simple, doesn't it? Initial reports are preliminary. They are often corrected.

Now apply that principle to JFK's assassination and the 40 years of theorizing based, in large part, on initial impressions which somehow are not allowed to be corrected unless by a government conspiracy.

The Left is doing, in this case, what both Left and Right do all the time, depending on whose ox is gored.

[Temple Owl]

There is no doubt that the jury reached the proper decision. Abu-Jamal was found guilty because he is guilty and he should die.