[PatrickHenry]

Updated list of responses from the denial crowd. I had predicted the first 7, the rest come from comments. My last listing (post 70) listed 20. Those that follow number 20 come after post 70:

1. It's a designed experiment. That proves ID!
   
2. It's a lie!
   
3. It hasn't speciated yet!
   
4. Blasphemy!
   
5. They're interpreting it through their naturalistic materialistic worldview.
   
6. How dare you use the screen name "PatrickHenry"?
   
7. Yeah, but "get your own dirt!"
   
8. This is only micro evolution, not macro evolution
   
9. They said: "... may also be on their way to sexual isolation ..." so it's typical evo weasel wording!
   
10. Playing god is what they are doing.
    
11. The point is this was done MANUALLY, It was NOT observed naturally ...
    
12. ... we as a people aren't all that bright. How much tweaking does it to take to do serious damage.
    
13. A deliberate laboratory forced change does NOT equal natural change.
    
14. Speciation my butt.
    
15. Now I admit, this is interesting even exciting, but proof? speciation?
    
16. So desperarate for REAL evidence of speciation, they will unashamedly boast of this?
    
17. Gee, a fly got turned into. . . a fly! Imagine that!
    
18. Does the article say if the differentiating species can still interbreed?
    
19. But will the "new species" be able to procreate?
    
20. [Y]ou aren't nearly as intelligent as your reply here indicates you believe yourself to be.
    
21. PatrickHenry, unable to intellectually respond to any of the responses, is forced to merely list them.
    
22. So did God or mutation change the gene or was the change a product of intelligent design by some lab maven?
    
23. If evolution is based on chance mutation, the odds of several fruit flys altering in the same way, that one gene, are slim.
    
24. Did God do it, Patrick, or some scientist? Darwinism is in the eye of the beholder, Patrick.
    

Good stuff. Keep 'em coming!

[VadeRetro]

If we came from simpler life forms, why are there still creationists?

[Friend of thunder]

Good stuff. Keep 'em coming!

If you realy want more, try Alexander Pope The Dunciad Book IV

"O! would the Sons of Men once think their Eyes

And Reason giv'n them but to study Flies!

See Nature in some partial narrow shape,

And let the Author of the Whole escape:

Learn but to trifle; or, who most observe,

To wonder at their Maker, not to serve."

Just thought I’d through that in.

:)

[Last Visible Dog]

If evolution is based on chance mutation, the odds of several fruit flys altering in the same way, that one gene, are slim.

This is REALLY funny. PatrickHenry considers this comment "denial"

Like I said: Being unable to intellectually respond to any of the responses, PatrickHenry is forced to merely list them