Skip to comments.
Stacking the Hunt (canned hunting is more than crass — it's cruel)
New York Times ^
| December 9, 2003
| WAYNE PACELLE
Posted on 12/09/2003 7:11:23 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
1
posted on
12/09/2003 7:11:24 AM PST
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
Oh, Wacko Wayne Pacelle, the biggest "animal rights" nut in the country after Ingrid Newkirk.
How predictable.
2
posted on
12/09/2003 7:13:34 AM PST
by
Kenton
(This space for rent)
To: presidio9
Frankly, canned hunting is an apt metaphor
for the way the mutual fund sharpies skimmed
all the widows and orphans.
To: presidio9
A good many hunters also find the practice abhorrent.So do I. The process is as important as the product.
It's the hunting equivalent to buying a hooker because your too inadequate to snag a female.
4
posted on
12/09/2003 7:25:16 AM PST
by
elbucko
To: Kenton
I'm sure you know this, but for everyone else's information, Wayne Pacelle is a senior vice president of the Humane Society.
5
posted on
12/09/2003 7:25:48 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
canned hunting is weak.
6
posted on
12/09/2003 7:27:29 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: presidio9
Wayne Pacelle is a senior vice president of the Humane Society. I didn't...thanks for the info.
..their a crop, like corn/soy beans and the Hunters are paying a high price for the hunt, thereby providing a range for other animal species....besides the animals don't know it.
7
posted on
12/09/2003 7:31:53 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: presidio9
>A growing number of people, however, are
embracing a different set of rules

To: presidio9
Wayne Pacelle is a senior vice president of the Humane Society. I didn't...thanks for the info.
..their a crop, like corn/soy beans and the Hunters are paying a high price for the hunt, thereby providing a range for other animal species....besides the animals don't know it.
9
posted on
12/09/2003 7:35:23 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: presidio9
While I don't agree with the drugging, shooting in cages, etc. It needs to be noted that these are not in a small fenced area, they are on large acreage parcels of land that are fenced to keep the dangerous animals from roaming onto someone elses land and attacking a person.
I couldn't afford to hunt at one of these places, let alone in Africa, and I don't think I would anyway. However, these places may become the only places to hunt if the environuts get their way. Of course, they could also get closed up by the environuts.
10
posted on
12/09/2003 7:36:17 AM PST
by
looscnnn
("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
To: skinkinthegrass
..their a crop, like corn/soy beans and the Hunters are paying a high price for the hunt, thereby providing a range for other animal species....besides the animals don't know it. My neighbors raise pheasants in a large netted enclosure and then release them in a field the day of the hunt. These birds are fairly tame and often don't bolt until the hunters are right on top of them, making for a rather easy shot. In a way, it's not any different from raising a chicken to chop off its neck prior to dinner, but I don't consider the hunting involved very sporting.
11
posted on
12/09/2003 7:37:25 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
To: elbucko
So do I. The process is as important as the product. It's the hunting equivalent to buying a hooker because your too inadequate to snag a female.
I agree, insomuch as the term 'hunting' is used. It's a rather "girly-man" way to bag a beast.
I don't find it particularly cruel, however - and anyone who does has bought into the PETA dogma. Anyone who claims this is cruel has to then be upset about animals raised in pens for slaughter. And I'm not giving up bacon.
To: presidio9
What's the sport in hunting cans? Reminds me of that scene in The Jerk, "...he hates these cans."
13
posted on
12/09/2003 7:40:53 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Are you blind with an IQ under 50? Then you too can be an ACC football referee.)
To: dirtboy
If you know a kid in 1-3 grade, read this book to him or her:
14
posted on
12/09/2003 7:54:47 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: beezdotcom; elbucko
This is classic divide-and-conquer by HSUS. The concept of hunting "fenced" animals is naturally repugnant to ethical hunters, yet the reality is that the "fences" contain hundreds and frequently thousands of acres.
If you value hunting, don't fall for this nonsense and support a ban on so-called "canned" hunts. Like "assault" weapons, it's part of an incrementalist strategy.
15
posted on
12/09/2003 7:56:39 AM PST
by
d-back
To: beezdotcom
I saw a film of a black leopard that had been declawed and released from a cage in front of some "good ol' boys" with a dozen dogs. The dogs promptly tore the leopard apart and the owners cheered and stood with one foot on the leopard in victory. Now that is a real bunch of men.
To: beezdotcom
I saw a film of a black leopard that had been declawed and released from a cage in front of some "good ol' boys" with a dozen dogs. The dogs promptly tore the leopard apart and the owners cheered and stood with one foot on the leopard in victory. Now that is a real bunch of men.
To: ThinkLikeWaterAndReeds
I saw a film of a black leopard that had been declawed and released from a cage in front of some "good ol' boys" with a dozen dogs. The dogs promptly tore the leopard apart and the owners cheered and stood with one foot on the leopard in victory. Now that is a real bunch of men.
No argument. Nonetheless, I'd rather be THAT leopard than a pig in a slaughterhouse. More than that, I'd rather just eat them both.
To: d-back
I say anyone that would go on one of these hunts is a mouth-breathing girly man no matter how much land the animals are fenced in.
The analogy of the nerd using hookers because that's all he can get is extremely accurate. These clowns would soil themselves on a real hunt.
Personally I adhere to the "Nugent Doctrine" when it comes to my hunting. I much prefer the crossbow to a rifle and the process of tracking the beast is where I get most of my enjoyment. I even think the use of feeders really reduces the challenge, but hey, if you're not up to it, you're not up to it.
19
posted on
12/09/2003 8:07:59 AM PST
by
Zansman
To: beezdotcom
I don't find it particularly cruel, however
I don't either, in general, except that some (perhaps most) of these people are horrible shots, and end up mangling the animal before it finally dies. When it takes you 3 or 4 shots at 10 feet to kill a pheasant on a short leash, that's pretty lame.
I love hunting, but if you're going to do something like that, why not just beat it to death with a baseball bat?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson