Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ispy4u
You are only confusing the situation by not looking to the basic breach of discipline, and that is all he is charged with.

If that is truly the issue then you'd do well to not refer to a screed that revolves around the premise that our actions are contrary to the Geneva Convention...

You have to admit that there's been a spiraling out of control of the media spin on each side here. Col. West may have "broke the rules", but that infraction should have warranted quite a bit milder treatment and maybe a review of how we treat combatants out of uniform (with a subsequent dispersal of the negative aspects of harsher non-uniformed combatants treatment to the locals). It's obvious that the current situation will just have people over there walking on eggshells should he be hammered, and the fact that he faces a harsh punishment is the reason this has been brought into the public spotlight...

144 posted on 12/09/2003 7:43:26 AM PST by Axenolith (<tag>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Axenolith
The soldiers have no need to walk on egg shells, they have been taught exactly what is expected of them concerning handling of prisoners.

There is no need to fear if you are doing the right thing, sometimes the right thing is tough to do, but we've all been there before.

I don't think his punishment will be harsh at all, it was probably never intented to be harsh but the evidence supported the charge of aggravated assault and in order to present uniform discipline and justice, get out or court martial were the fair options.
149 posted on 12/09/2003 7:58:02 AM PST by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson