Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ispy4u
No, he was offered to leave without retirement, but he chose court martial, so it's his choice.

Some offer. He made the right choice, but never should've been put in that position.

Yes 20 years does not mean 19.999. Never has never will.

Can't argue with your math skills there. Which is why I believe he should've been disciplined and allowed to serve out the additional .001 without being forced to "choose" a court martial in order to protect the 19.999 years of service he gave to this country.

131 posted on 12/09/2003 7:20:15 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: PBRSTREETGANG
Since his alleged crime occured prior to 20 and the plea bargain was made prior to 20 then if he wanted to keep his retirement his only choice was court martial.

Them's the breaks, no difference in my eyes between dishonorable service at 19.999 and dishonorable service at 18 should we wait 2 years for their retirement before plea bargain? 18 years is a lot of honorable service too.

That's one of the hard lessons of the military, when disciplin is done correctly, it's by god tough!
137 posted on 12/09/2003 7:27:24 AM PST by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson