That's it. Don't answer any of my points or questions.
Try, and that's what it is - trying, to make it seem as if you are the only one with any knowledge of the situation.
I don't buy it and I'm pointing it out to others so they can reach their own opinion.
If you have anything from the article 32 that is pertinent to anything I've said then post it in a reply. Then maybe I'll give it some thought.
BTW, the leanings, if not outright bias, of this author should tell you something.
From the Article 32 hearing, LTC West admitted that he was present while his soldiers "roughed up" the policeman and did not stop it.
As far as the rest, if you didn't know this well publicised statement, how much more time do I need to waste rehashing something you can go read for yourself.
Please do.