[justshutupandtakeit]

Early reports were that there were wounds consistent with self-defense.

[elli1]

I thought I'd heard that there weren't self-defense wounds but I didn't pay much attn. to the case the first 2-3 days. So I went back & read some reports & those reports are all over the place. One said it was a "furious fight" & another said "no signs of struggle". Another said it appeared there were at least two attackers & that one had held him. Supposedly signs of torture on the torso and knife wounds to the neck & torso. Can't find anything being written about wounds to the hands or arms (those wouldn't be interpreted as serious anyway--but would indicate self-defensive types of wounds.)

Inconsistency seems to be the hallmark of journalism, but one would think they could be more accurate given all the tools they have for communication.