[Trollstomper]

"Why the hyperbole here? Wasn't Norquist responding to accusations by Gaffney about Suhail Kahn?"


No. as the record shows, Gaffney was questioning the judgment of people letting the likes Alamoudi, AlArian and Awad into the WH and otehr meetings, and, of sendng the FBI director to address Alamoudi and Vickers' American Muslim Counil, see above. Grover responded to that, and to Gaffney's same point at CPAC re Ali Tulbah (who had just been thanked by the AMC fro brining them in to the WH)-- the same way he repsonds to all criticsm, by twisting it, calling it racist and then denouncing you as a Bigot. Gaffney did not attack call them traitors or terrorists, or any such thing. Period

[FreeReign]

"Why the hyperbole here? Wasn't Norquist responding to accusations by Gaffney about Suhail Kahn?"

No. as the record shows, Gaffney was questioning the judgment of people letting the likes Alamoudi, AlArian and Awad into the WH and otehr meetings, and, of sendng the FBI director to address Alamoudi and Vickers' American Muslim Counil, see above. Grover responded to that, and to Gaffney's same point at CPAC re Ali Tulbah (who had just been thanked by the AMC fro brining them in to the WH)-- the same way he repsonds to all criticsm, by twisting it, calling it racist and then denouncing you as a Bigot. Gaffney did not attack call them traitors or terrorists, or any such thing. Period

Gaffney made charges that both Suhail Kahn and Ali Tulbah have family ties to extremist Wahhabi religious groups.

Did Gaffney backup his charges against both Kahn and Tulbah with supporting information? Can you? What are the details of these family ties?