Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William McKinley
This explanation doesn't cut it for me.

< -snip- >

In other words, instead of this explanation making me more credulous, it makes me less.

Fair enough; it's a good point. That's why I sent the e-mail to Gaffney.

Which leads me to the same place this thread has led me. I am troubled by some of the things regarding Norquist which appear to me to be undeniable, such as why he was pushing for the election (as a Republican) of someone who fits in well with Stalinist groups like the IAC. But I am also skeptical of some of the information presented as evidence of his perfidy.

The problem Norquist has, I think, is that even if not everything Gaffney's written were to bear out, there is too much there for that alone to exonerate Grover.

Particularly unconvincing are Norquist's lies and race-baiting in response to this story.


609 posted on 12/15/2003 1:13:15 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
The problem Norquist has, I think, is that even if not everything Gaffney's written were to bear out, there is too much there for that alone to exonerate Grover.

Particularly unconvincing are Norquist's lies and race-baiting in response to this story.

I'm pretty much where you are at.
610 posted on 12/15/2003 1:15:15 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

To: Sabertooth
>>race-baiting

Screaming racism is a dead giveaway, dontcha think.

The last or the only refuge....
611 posted on 12/15/2003 1:17:28 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

To: Sabertooth; William McKinley
I concur as well. It's clear that, for whatever reason, Grover's been hanging around with undesirables. The interesting question now is, why? Was he, as has been implied, a willing accomplice? Did he think he was co-opting them somehow? Or was he truly ignorant about them?

I'm not sure that the way Norquist has reacted is as revealing as one might think. Imagine for a moment that he was really duped by these folks, and now he's being accused of being an active abetter of terrorists, essentially being accused of treason, for want of a better word. If I were falsely accused, and had been duped myself, I myself might react very badly to charges that I was a knowing accomplice of terrorists. In any case, though, his answer has to be better than "my accusers are racists" - that won't wash.

612 posted on 12/15/2003 1:20:57 PM PST by general_re (Knife goes in, guts come out! That's what Osaka Food Concern is all about!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson