Insightful and contributive as expected and exampled in past.
Please. You're the last one who ought to be castigating others for arguing on the merits, with your thus-far imaginary claims of insider knowledge. When you contribute something objectively verifiable, original, or insightful - besides a bunch of Google suggestions and clapped-out magazine articles - then you can reasonably expect to have your claims of insiderdom better received. But so far, you've done nothing of the sort, presenting nothing that anyone here A) didn't already know, or; B) couldn't have easily found out given five minutes of looking. Nor have you even remotely "demonstrated" your background, as you rather artlessly claim, apparently under the impression that if you assert a thing loudly enough and often enough, you can get someone to believe it.
Which, come to think of it, is pretty much the sum total of your posts. You've been running around here dropping hints about how you know things the rest of us don't, but so far you've managed to avoid posting anything that even remotely resembles objectively verifiable inside knowledge, and now I'm calling bullshit. Unless you're prepared to verify that you are who you claim you are, I suggest you drop this habit of arguing from your own non-existent authority, using bombast and bluster about who you supposedly are to try knocking down anyone who questions you, and instead try coming up with something insightful and/or original. Unless and until you can do that, you can pretty much consider yourself stomped, troll.