[rmlew]

That would explain why the BigGov neocons are trying to purge anti-tax warrior Norquest.
Lose the paranoia it and hysteria are the greatest impediments of paleos.
There are only x possibilities of Norquists behavior:
1. He has bought into the PC relativism of the left and refuses to judge minorities by objective standards.
2. He opposes the nation-state and thus does not agree with the concept of treason.
3. He is ignorant of the charges because he refuses to see them.
4. He cares more about bringing the Muslim vote than the threat to the country.
None of these are good reasons. Paleos should disdain the open-border WTO-supporting PC relativistic Norquist.
Don't tell me that the blinding hatred of Neocons by paleocons are bliding them to objective threats.

According to Lind, "The modern conservative brain trust originated in a scheme hatched in the 1970s by William E. Simon, Irving Kristol, and others." The plan was to make conservative intellectuals, hitherto an independent-minded, quirky, and diverse community, a controlled monolith that would function as the reliable tool of the Republican Party. "By the early 1990s, thanks to the success of the Simon-Kristol initiative, almost all major conservative magazines, think tanks, and even individual scholars had become dependent on money from a small number of conservative foundations."
1. Is that Michael or William Lind?
2. Considering that many neocons including Kristol were DEMOCRATS in 1970, I find this to be a laughable conspiracy rant.

[EverFree]

Lose the paranoia

Lose the puffery; you objectively overuse the word objectively.

He refuses to judge minorities by objective standards.

Please expand on this fascinating concept of judging minorities by objective standards.

He opposes the nation-state

Grover is not anarchist. To imply otherwise is paranoia and hysteria.

He is ignorant of the charges because he refuses to see them.

Circular logic, begging the question; next.

He cares more about bringing the Muslim vote than the threat to the country

He rejects that inflammatory assertion:

Ratner writes that I want to "bring Islamic fundamentalists into the Republican Party without regard to how they feel about terrorism or Americans, let alone Republicans." This is not true. And it is silly. It is, however, a sad lie that a handful of bigots have tried to spread to attack President Bush and others.

Paleos should disdain the open-border WTO-supporting PC relativistic Norquist.

America will never abandon free minds and free markets.

Don't tell me that the blinding hatred of Neocons by paleocons are bliding them to objective threats.

You overuse the Disagreement Is Blindness metaphor. You misspell it on the third use because your hands are as tired of typing it as we are of reading it.

1. Is that Michael or William Lind?

The particular author has no bearing on the fact of the statement.

many neocons including Kristol were DEMOCRATS in 1970

Read harder: Lind (objectively) says 1970s. Not 1970 (your strawman).