Then again, it's possible--just possible, mind you--that some of the "social liberals" who are defending Norquist and his moslem allies are anti-Israel "palaeocons."
PaleoConservatives are not "social liberals". They tend tobe civilizational or Christian conservatives. Most belong to the orthodox branches of their faiths. Most Pre-Vatican II Catholics I know are paleos.
I was theorizing that some of the "social liberals" defending Norquist are "palaeo" poseurs who are merely adopting a stance in order to defend anti-Semites. I did not mean to imply that I believed "palaeos" were actually social liberals.