It's only my contention that I haven't seen evidence that Norquist knowingly was trying to help terrorists gain access to the WH.
Then you didn't read the article. Gaffney makes a huge damning case and Norquist has reacted defensively - not with facts refuting the charges.
No we don't have anyone corroborating Gaffney's charges - but Norquists defensive behavior comes damn close to proving Gaffney's case.