Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
It is ironic to see Norquist's critics using the same logic used by Tom Foley to get taxpayers to fund a fishing expedition against George H. W. Bush.

I'm too cynical to see the "irony."
I just see the same slimeball methods continuing uninterrupted.

Now they're hopping mad that W. is letting the Perles destroy themselves, and has no intention of cutting off Norquist.

152 posted on 12/09/2003 8:49:32 PM PST by EverFree (Gonzalez for Mayor of SF! Rip out the demonrats' San Francisco heart !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: EverFree
The neo-conservatives have the situation assessed pretty accurately, although they tend to be a little impatient at times. Nobody's come up with a better approach than they have in the post-9/11 world.

I'm in full agreement with David Frum's "Unpatriotic Conservatives" article. I also agree with the foreign-policy agenda espoused by the Project for a New American Century and I subscribe to the Weekly Standard. That said, Grover Norquist's approach to tax issues and his libertarian stance (for the most part) on social issues is where I also feel comfortable. I think the latter is what is motivating a good portion ofthe atatcks from some of his detractors, and others seek to use this current mess to try to take him down a few pegs.

154 posted on 12/09/2003 9:01:18 PM PST by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson