Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They came, they saw the conquerors (750,000 in Trafalgar Square)
The Times ^ | December 9, 2003 | Simon Barnes

Posted on 12/08/2003 10:29:25 PM PST by Prodigal Son

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: hellinahandcart
So do I.

You don't like it when he calls the French "Frogs"? I would think this would be the sort of thing the average freeper would like.

21 posted on 12/09/2003 1:44:30 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
We're going to have to permanently disagree then. I think his comments were in a much larger context, only periphally involving the sporting world.
22 posted on 12/09/2003 1:50:19 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
LOL, he's a sports writer. Writing about sports is exactly what he does and the ugly side of football patriotism is something every sports writer in the UK has to deal with on a regular basis. I think back to 1999 when the Scottish crowd jeered during the national anthem when England played the Scots in Glasgow. It's quite a serious issue here. This crowd in Trafalgar Square showed us that patriotism doesn't have to be ugly and I'm glad.

Peruse some of his other columns. No hidden political agendas there.

23 posted on 12/09/2003 2:00:52 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
You don't like it when he calls the French "Frogs"? I would think this would be the sort of thing the average freeper would like.

I didn't see the word "frog" in this article, PS, but there still wouldn't be a lot to like, after the poisoned paragraph.

24 posted on 12/09/2003 2:02:02 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
He calls the French Frogs in other columns. Obviously, it's not in this article because it's not about France.

I thought it was rather a nice paragraph.

25 posted on 12/09/2003 2:09:43 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son; hellinahandcart
I don't want to but in on a private conversation: but can I say that from the point of view of an Englishman, Prodigal Son's comments on the relative perception of overt, public expressions of patriotism in the UK as contrasted with the US are very astute. It seems to me that misunderstandings of the historical background to this difference do quite often lead to misunderstandings by US freepers of the real attitute of my countrymen to their country. The fact that we mistrust loud public expressions of patriotism doesn't mean we're not patriotic: quite the contrary, in fact.
26 posted on 12/09/2003 4:47:06 AM PST by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Winniesboy
There's no such thing as a "private conversation" on the forum. ;D
27 posted on 12/09/2003 5:41:04 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart; Winniesboy
There's no such thing as a "private conversation" on the forum. ;D

True ;-)

28 posted on 12/09/2003 4:02:03 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
I am the belle of the ball today. Why, just ask anyone.

(batting eyes)
30 posted on 12/09/2003 5:58:39 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
For what it's worth, I agree with the other posters about the way flag-waving is perceived in the UK, and why. The only people who normally go in for waving the Union Jack in a big way are vicious neo-Nazi soccer thugs and two closely associated political parties the BNP and National Front.

The way British people tend to look at it is that they know they're British, don't need to wave a flag to prove it and tend to think that anyone who does, except on some particular occasions like royal processions, major international sports victories and so on, is either some sort of nutter or maybe even a sinister ultra-nationalist psychopath of some kind, like the neo-Nazi who was planting nail-bombs in gay pubs and asian markets a few years ago and whose rooms were decorated with Union Jacks and Nazi memorabilia.

I'm sure this plays at least some part in the negative perceptions of US style patriotism among my countrymen, athough most seem to understand that it's just another of the odd ways in which Americans differ from British people.
31 posted on 12/10/2003 2:56:17 AM PST by bernie_g
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g
You guys are not the first to explain this to me, you know.

And just for the record, I am not a huge flag-displayer myself. I have a small flag on my front door, and a few pins that I wear at appropriate times, and that's it. But I can't imagine being put off or offended by larger displays or patriotic celebrations.

I said earlier to PS that we'll just have to permanently disagree about this, because no matter how many ways you present it, it is ALWAYS going to seem strange to me.

Strange that you can look at drunken soccer fans and conclude that it's not the violence, but the flag-waving, that is to be associated with their behavior.

That it wasn't Hitler's ideology and aggression, but his nationalism, that was the problem.

That celebrating one's country publicly is intrinsically bad, so much so that this author expresses wonder that this one event was benign.

This is always going to seem odd to me, and it is also always going to remind me of the leftist school of thought that assures us we'd all be better off if we dispensed with the idea of nationhood altogether. Sorry.

I can accept that you feel that way, but I can never understand feeling that way. Particularly when you have so much of which to be proud.

32 posted on 12/10/2003 4:10:36 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g
And anyone who would combine Nazi memorabilia and the Union Jack in their home decor is a nut-deluxe. But again, I don't understand how it's the flag that's the problem, the tip-off to psychosis, rather than the nail bombs and Nazi stuff.

He was abusing your flag. I don't understand finding the flag itself distasteful, rather than the abuser. I simply don't. Never will.

33 posted on 12/10/2003 4:22:53 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
I think it's a different idea of what's an appropriate time to wave flags. Most British people are used to seeing this on certain very special national occasions only. The rest of the time, the only people who go in for it are violent neo-nazis. So there is an unfair and perhaps unconcious presumption that people who wave flags a lot are neo-nazis.
34 posted on 12/10/2003 5:41:10 AM PST by bernie_g
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g
or, as Kipling put it, "jelly-bellied flag flappers."

In context: "The Flag of Their Country" (Stalky & Co.)

It predates WWII, or WWI even. The Brits are just more restrained, it has to be a major event before they'll let go with an orgy of patriotism.

35 posted on 12/10/2003 5:46:55 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . sed, ut scis, quis homines huiusmodi intellegere potest?. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g
So there is an unfair and perhaps unconcious presumption that people who wave flags a lot are neo-nazis.

Yeah, tell me about it. I get a little sick of hearing that America is "looking like Nazi Germany". But I've noticed that many liberals have a lot of trouble making distinctions between one thing and an entirely different thing. It's all the same to them.

There were a few lefties here, screeching that country singer Toby Keith had threatened them all with death on Thanksgiving Day. What did he do? He sang "Courtesy of the Red White and Blue" during the halftime show of a football game. With a flag behind him somewhere.

They took those lyrics personally. And they find the flag extremely threatening. Three guesses why.

Transnationalism is going to be a lot more dangerous in the end than nationalism, in my opinion.

36 posted on 12/10/2003 5:51:28 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson