To: jwh_Denver
Without Lennon's weird edge, Paul was nothing but bubblegum pop.
Without Paul's pop sense, Lennon was nothing but edgy and weird.
50 posted on
12/08/2003 8:23:45 PM PST by
dead
(I used to believe in a lot of things. All of it! Now I believe only in dynamite.)
To: dead
Without Lennon's weird edge, Paul was nothing but bubblegum pop.Without Paul's pop sense, Lennon was nothing but edgy and weird. I don't know if I agree 100%....... but would say this is one of the most perceptive assessments of the Lennon-McCartney magic that produced such broadly appealing music.
And it became more obvious after they split up.
65 posted on
12/08/2003 8:34:23 PM PST by
Jorge
To: dead
Without Lennon's weird edge, Paul was nothing but bubblegum pop.
Without Paul's pop sense, Lennon was nothing but edgy and weird.
I think the tendency for what you are saying is true but I don't agree with it totally. Back when Sgt. Peppers was released the "old folks" looked at "When I'm Sixty Four" as a "heavy" song. No doubt with John's help because the song really is satirical.
174 posted on
12/08/2003 11:11:33 PM PST by
jwh_Denver
(1+1+1+1= more than 4)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson