So, in other words, you believe that there were no abortions in the Us prior to Roe v. Wade.
You want irrational?
Find yourself a mirror.
By the way, let it be noted that (as usual), you have already begun the personal attacks, and posts filled with zero substance.
Assuming there was you seem to think it is the courts imprimatur to get a whiff of populism and then make laws from the bench that accord with that populism.
That is not the purpose of the courts, it is the legislatures duty to make laws. The US Constitution guarantees a republican form of government to every state in the union. Judicial oligarchy is not a "republican form of government".
Thirty Eight states have passed DOMA. The people of Massachusetts last year gathered enough signatures to put DOMA on the ballot for referendum. The Massachusetts Constitution explicitly states that marriage is the sole province of the Governor and the legislature. And yet you claim that the Mass SJC is not engaging in judicial activism or if it is it is justified in doing so by populist sentiment.
In either case your idea of the duties of courts to intrepret and not make laws are 180 degrees out of phase from mine and never the twain shall meet. It is basically senseless to carry on the debate becasue the only thing getting any sharper is the animosity.