Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jorge
What do you say to the argument that marriage was, at one time, between a man and a woman and another woman? That arrangement has legal and religous presednese.
32 posted on 12/08/2003 9:32:40 PM PST by Unassuaged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Unassuaged
When society needed much physical labor (especially to work land) and had higher mortality rates, a prolific family could easily been made with multiple wives.

Times have changed and such marriages are not the norm. Child labor and slave labor are frowned upon in the Western world now. There are nations that still permit polygamy. You will also find the practice of mistresses and even the ownership of sexual slaves in them. Those wives are for childbearing.
141 posted on 12/09/2003 12:38:59 AM PST by weegee (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Unassuaged
Anywhere a civil union conforms to the biologically natural design of male-female...they are morally superior to homosexual unions.

The fact that not all heterosexual marriages are perfect doesn't make gay marriage anymore acceptable.

362 posted on 12/11/2003 7:35:44 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson